Document Type

Undergraduate Research Paper

Publication Date

2024

Paper Status

Winner

Abstract

This paper conducts a comprehensive exploration of the re-emergence of debtors' prisons within the contemporary American justice system, with a particular emphasis on their unjust ramifications for marginalized individuals. Tracing the historical evolution of societal perspectives on debt, the paper acknowledges the prohibition of debtors' prisons in 1833. A pivotal focus is the 1983 Bearden v. Georgia court decision, which introduced ambiguity in determining "indigent" or "willful" status within the context of criminal justice debt. This ambiguity has, at times, been exploited by local judges, leading to the incarceration and entrapment of extremely impoverished individuals in a self-perpetuating cycle of despair. The paper argues for precise legal standards to forestall debt-related incarceration and highlights how the persistent lack of clarity perpetuates a cycle of debt and imprisonment. It scrutinizes the complicity of laws and exposes the political feasibility of exploiting those with the least political power, as evidenced in the attitudes of lawmakers advocating for a userfunded system. The examination extends to cases where debt is transferred to third-party entities imposing exorbitant fees, disproportionately affecting economically disadvantaged individuals. Drawing on various sources, including scholarly articles and legal documents, the research integrates visual aids such as charts and tables derived from studies, reports, and articles. Central to the paper is the exploration of how the resurgence of debtors' prisons, coupled with unclear legal definitions, disproportionately impacts impoverished individuals, impeding their ability to settle criminal justice debt and perpetuating a cycle of debt and imprisonment. The research aims to shed light on these challenges and proposes reforms that champion a fair and just criminal justice system accessible to everyone.

Download

Share

COinS