Title
Assessing the efficacy of group model building workshops in an applied setting through purposive text analysis
Publication Date
4-1-2020
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Group model building (GMB) approaches have been shown to improve participants' understanding of complexity by shifting and aligning individuals' mental models of the interconnections within complex systems. However, reviews of GMB literature have identified knowledge gaps for assessing the efficacy of GMB activities. To address these gaps, these studies recommend assessing multiple cases, shifting from controlled to applied settings, and reporting on objective measures. We address each of these items by comparing the outputs of multiple community-based GMB workshops to participants' mental models elicited through pre-workshop interviews. Using purposive text analysis, we developed causal loop diagrams for comparison to a group workshop model. Through a quantitative analysis, we find that individuals convened in GMB workshops have greater alignment on factors, causal links, and feedback. We believe these contributions can help other GMB practitioners better assess the efficacy of their activities with more rigor and detail.
Publication Title
System Dynamics Review
Volume
36
Issue
2
First Page
135
Last Page
157
DOI
10.1002/sdr.1657
Recommended Citation
Valcourt, Nicholas; Walters, Jeffrey; Javernick‐Will, Amy; and Linden, Karl, "Assessing the efficacy of group model building workshops in an applied setting through purposive text analysis" (2020). School of Engineering and Technology Publications. 436.
https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/tech_pub/436