Publication Date
2019
Document Type
Article
Abstract
My comments aim to cast light on a specific political proposal that can arise from a discussion of the topic of the ‘refusal of work’ and its implications for a social radical change. Autonomist, anarchist and feminist activism, have been and are the main sources of a long-term conceptual and empirical work on the refusal of work. Refusal of work is a very complex concept that has traversed history and is reduced for uncritical dominant common sense to unemployment, laziness, idleness, indolence but it is in reality one of the basic foundational qualification to think any radical change. Among many important intuitions, the added value of Silvia Federici’s work is to have offered a different perspective on the refusal of work discussion and how it can be expressed to develop different forms of communing. Her work provides the backbone for this brief excursion on the issue of the refusal of work. Emerging and consolidated social movements, for example in Southern Europe, have, consciously or not, taken position, often contradictorily, regarding what refusal of work means. In the context of current neoliberal capitalism, an increasing structural unemployment and precarious jobs are one of the trademarks of austerity policies to ‘revive’ economies. Drawing on Federici’s insights on the women exclusion as a useful way of thinking about the spatial dimension of these issues in feminist theory, this article looks at examples of prefigurative politics that define their strategies of refusal of work building significant spatial patterns. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Publication Title
Gender, Place and Culture
DOI
10.1080/0966369X.2018.1551780
Publisher Policy
pre print, post print (12 month embargo)
Open Access Status
OA Deposit
Recommended Citation
Mudu, P., "Dies-Non: Refusal of Work in the 21st Century" (2019). Urban Studies Publications. 131.
https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/urban_pub/131
